Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answerKusząca perspektywa. |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answerNajlepiej wcale. Dwa podstawowe problemy polskiej ochrony zdrowia to: brak personelu i chroniczne niedofinansowanie. Najpierw należy rozwiązać te problemy, a dopiero potem można zacząć się zastanawiać w jakim zakresie i czy w ogóle jest potrzebna prywatyzacja w jakiejkolwiek formie. |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer是的,但是只有在他们在此国家生活5年后 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answerNie. Jest to również drastyczna forma protestu i przekazu. |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answerMyślę, ze jeśli jakiś chrześcijanin dopuści się aktu terrorystycznego należy zakazać wjazdu wszystkim chrześcijanom. Niech żyje odpowiedzialność zbiorowa. No i oczywiście zakaz wjazdu do Polski dla ukrów bo wołyń. (Osoba wymyślająca te pytania rozumiem, że jest pracownikiem TVP?) |
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品 |
国内政策 › 视频监控
9>9 Personal answerYes, and more police should be added to high crime areas |
交通运输 › 公共交通
9>9 Personal answerNależy zamknąć centra miast dla ruchu samochodów i poprawić jakość transportu publicznego. A biorąc pod uwagę w jaki sposób ludzie zachowują się w transporcie publicznym można by wprowadzić do szkoły zajęcia dotyczące zachowania się w miejscach publicznych. |
外交政策 › European Commission
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerCo to jest za pytanie? XD. Zabijać osoby podejrzane? Co do chuja? Czy ktoś kto w ogóle czytał te pytania? |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answer不 |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerPytanie brzmi: dlaczego odmówiły? Każdy powinien mieć prawo do godnego miejsca zamieszkania. Należy pomagać osobom w kryzysie bezdomności. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerNo, private prisons will sacrifice quality of care and rehabilitation services for profit |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.