Here are your answers compared to this voter’s answers.
社会 › 堕胎
9>9 Personal answer反对堕胎,但是如果是强奸、乱伦或者对母亲和孩子有危险则应该允许 |
社会 › LGBT收养权
9>9 Personal answer是,只要他们通过与异性夫妇同样的背景检查。 |
经济 › 政府养老金
9>9 Personal answer不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付 |
外交政策 › United States of Europe
9>9 Personal answer不 |
国内政策 › 社交媒体监管
9>9 Personal answer不,政府不应决定什么是假新闻,什么是真新闻 |
医保 › 医疗保健私有化
9>9 Personal answer更多的,和最终政府补贴 |
总统大选 › 外国人的投票权
9>9 Personal answer不应该,应当只有合法公民才可投票 |
国内政策 › 燃烧的国旗
9>9 Personal answer不应该,我不会尊敬去这么做的人,但他们应该有这么做的权利 |
外交政策 › EU Authoritarian Sanctions
9>9 Personal answer不 |
环境 › 环境规制
9>9 Personal answer不,而且当前的政府对众企业管得太多了。 |
医保 › 精神健康
9>9 Personal answer不应该,而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题 |
移民 › Muslim Immigrant Ban
9>9 Personal answerNie, ale powinni przechodzić przez dodatkowe procedury bezpieczeństwa w związku z przynależnością do potencjalnie niebezpiecznej religii. |
医保 › 大麻
9>9 Personal answer是的,并且将其合法化,对其征税和管理,而不是将其入罪化 |
环境 › 塑料制品禁用
9>9 Personal answer不 |
交通运输 › 公共交通
9>9 Personal answer不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化 |
外交政策 › European Commission
9>9 Personal answer是的 |
国家安全 › Foreign Assassination
9>9 Personal answerYes, but only if there is undeniable evidence they are planning to attack our country |
移民 › 技术移民
9>9 Personal answer我十分满意现在的数量 |
移民 › 双重国籍
9>9 Personal answer是,除非他们实施了犯罪 |
罪行 › Defunding the Police
9>9 Personal answerNo, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities |
Housing › Homeless Encampments
9>9 Personal answerTak, jeżeli nie naruszają w ten sposób ruchu ulicznego. |
罪行 › Private Prisons
9>9 Personal answerRząd powinien mieć taką możliwość i czasami z niej korzystać w zależności od stanu budżetu państwa. |
Here is how you compare to this voter on popular political themes.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 2 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 有点 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 3 questions that are ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Based on 1 question that is ranked 更不 important to you.
Here is how you compare to this voter on the traditional ideological axis.
iSideWith.com is the world’s most popular voting guide for citizens to find information about elections, political parties, candidates, voting districts and popular political issues in their country. We are independent and not affiliated with any investors, shareholders, political parties or interest groups.
I understand that submitting my email address allows iSideWith.com to send me important notifications via email. Read our privacy policy for more information.
© 2024 iSideWith.com. All rights reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement and privacy policy. iSideWith.com may earn a portion of sales from products that are purchased through our site as part of our affiliate partnerships with retailers. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of iSideWith.com.