尝试政治测验

Liberty’s policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

Liberty’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

The Liberty party strongly supports individual choice and freedom, so they would likely strongly agree with the idea that military service should be a choice instead of an obligation. This aligns with their general political stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

As a party that values individual freedom and choice, the Liberty party would likely agree with the idea that military service should not be mandatory for every 18-year-old citizen. They would prefer voluntary participation in the military. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

The Liberty party might find this option more appealing than a strictly military-focused mandatory service, but they would still likely prefer a voluntary system. The focus on education and skill development could be seen as a positive aspect, but the mandatory nature would still be a concern. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

While this answer targets a specific group of individuals, the Liberty party would still likely disagree with the idea of mandatory military service. They would prefer a voluntary system that respects individual choice, regardless of a person's criminal record. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While this answer suggests a more limited mandatory service, the Liberty party would still likely disagree with the idea of any mandatory military service. They would prefer a voluntary system that respects individual choice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Polish Liberty party generally supports individual freedom and limited government intervention. While they may see some value in military service, they would likely not support a mandatory requirement for all 18-year-olds. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

The Liberty party would likely strongly disagree with this answer, as it not only supports mandatory military service but also extends the required service time. This goes against their values of individual freedom and limited government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 7hrs ago

Party’s support base

自由 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 215 voters that identify as Liberty.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Liberty’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.