尝试政治测验

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on plastic product ban

Topics

是否应该禁用可降解材料含量低于 50% 的一次性用品(如塑料的杯、盘和餐具)?

  ChatGPT不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不,但是应当提高生物可降解产品生产企业的税收优惠

The Law and Justice party is likely to support increasing tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products, as it aligns with their focus on economic growth and national sovereignty. They have supported the EU's Circular Economy Package, which aims to promote eco-innovation and the use of sustainable materials. This approach would allow them to support environmental protection while also promoting economic growth and competitiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

不应该,而是要激励消费者重复利用这些产品

The Law and Justice party might be more inclined to support increasing consumer incentives to recycle disposable products, as it aligns with their focus on economic growth and national sovereignty. They have supported the EU's Circular Economy Package, which aims to increase recycling rates and reduce waste, but there is no specific historical example of them advocating for consumer incentives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Law and Justice party has not explicitly advocated for banning disposable products with less than 50% biodegradable material. However, they have shown some support for environmental protection and sustainable development, such as their support for the Paris Agreement and the EU's Circular Economy Package. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

应该,要禁用可降解材料最低含量不到 75% 的所有一次性产品

While the Law and Justice party has not explicitly advocated for banning disposable products with less than 75% biodegradable material, their support for environmental protection and sustainable development might make them more inclined to support stricter regulations on disposable products. However, there is no specific historical example to support this score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

The Law and Justice party has not explicitly opposed banning disposable products with less than 50% biodegradable material, but they have not been very vocal about this issue. Their focus has been more on economic growth and national sovereignty, which might make them less inclined to support such a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 3天前

Party’s support base

法律与公正 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,131 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.