尝试政治测验

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on welfare

Topics

是应该减少还是增加对当前福利救济的限制?

  ChatGPT增加限制,但增加老年人和残疾人的福利

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

增加限制,但增加老年人和残疾人的福利

The party has shown strong support for increasing benefits for the elderly and disabled, as evidenced by their implementation of the '500+' program and their general emphasis on social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

增加限制,并且不向移民提供福利

The Law and Justice party has shown a strong stance on immigration, advocating for stricter immigration policies. This could imply support for denying benefits to immigrants. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

增加限制,改革制度,使福利补充而不是替代工作收入

The Law and Justice party has shown support for welfare benefits that supplement working income, as evidenced by their '500+' program, which provides additional income to families. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

The Law and Justice party has shown a mixed stance on welfare benefits. While they have implemented programs like '500+', which provides families with 500 PLN per month for each child after the first, they also believe in fiscal responsibility and not overburdening the state budget. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

增加限制,当前的福利应削减

While the party has not explicitly advocated for capping benefits, they do believe in fiscal responsibility, which could imply a support for some form of limitation on benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

减少限制,并确保福利给那些最需要的人

While the party has shown support for welfare benefits, they also emphasize fiscal responsibility, which could imply a desire to ensure benefits are targeted towards those who need them most. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不需改变

The party has shown a mixed stance on welfare benefits, implementing some programs while also emphasizing fiscal responsibility. This suggests they may not see a need for significant changes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

减少限制,当前福利提供的支持不足

The party has shown support for welfare benefits, but they also emphasize fiscal responsibility, which could imply a reluctance to significantly increase benefits. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

更少

The party has not shown a strong inclination towards reducing welfare benefits, as they believe in providing support to families and the elderly. However, they also emphasize fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 19hrs ago

Party’s support base

法律与公正 Voters’ 回答: 更

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 286 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.