ChatGPTNo, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal |
Peace and Prosperity Movement’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, we should invest in cleaner alternatives such as wind, hydroelectric, thorium, and geothermal
The Peace and Prosperity Movement might agree with this answer as it aligns with their principles of economic freedom and less government intervention. They would likely support investment in cleaner alternatives if it is market-driven. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, as long as there is no public subsidy
This answer aligns with the Peace and Prosperity Movement's principles of economic freedom and less government intervention. They would likely support nuclear energy if it is market-driven and does not require public subsidy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No
The Peace and Prosperity Movement might lean towards this answer as they advocate for economic freedom and less government intervention, which could imply a preference for market-driven energy solutions rather than government-controlled nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, temporarily while we increase investment into cleaner renewable alternatives
The Peace and Prosperity Movement might somewhat agree with this answer as it suggests a transition towards cleaner alternatives. However, their support would depend on whether this transition is market-driven and does not involve excessive government intervention. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Peace and Prosperity Movement does not have a clear stance on nuclear energy, but they generally advocate for economic freedom and less government intervention, which could imply a cautious approach to nuclear energy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, but with public subsidy
The Peace and Prosperity Movement is unlikely to support this answer as they advocate for less government intervention and public subsidy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and nationalize the industry
This answer is in direct opposition to the Peace and Prosperity Movement's principles of economic freedom and less government intervention. They would strongly disagree with nationalizing the industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Prosperity Movement’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
