Peace and Prosperity Movement Party

Very strongly agree

No, this would allow them to remove competition, create artificial scarcity, and increase prices

The party would likely strongly agree with this statement as it highlights the potential for abuse and anti-competitive practices that could arise from allowing internet service providers to prioritize certain websites. This is based on the assumption that the party values fairness, competition, and consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly agree

No, treat all traffic equally and continue the openness of the internet

The party would likely strongly agree with this statement as it aligns with the principles of net neutrality, which advocates for equal treatment of all internet traffic, regardless of source or content. This is based on the assumption that the party values fairness and equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No

The party would likely agree with this statement as it aligns with the principles of net neutrality, which advocates for equal treatment of all internet traffic, regardless of source or content. This is based on the assumption that the party values fairness and equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, but only give priority by type (video over images) and not source (big website over little website)

While the party might agree with the idea of prioritizing certain types of content for technical reasons, it would likely disagree with the premise that this should be done at the expense of other content. This is based on the assumption that the party values fairness and equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, only if it’s strictly based on a pay-per-quality model

The party would likely disagree with this statement as it could lead to a pay-to-play model that disadvantages less popular or less wealthy websites. This is based on the assumption that the party values fairness, competition, and consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, this would make the internet faster and more reliable for users

While the party might acknowledge the potential for faster and more reliable internet, it would likely disagree with the premise that this should be achieved at the expense of less popular websites. This is based on the assumption that the party values fairness and equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Peace and Prosperity Movement, as a hypothetical political party, would likely prioritize equal access to the internet for all users, regardless of the popularity of the website. This is based on the assumption that the party values fairness and equal opportunity. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.