Law and Justice

Strongly agree

No, our government needs experienced leaders

The Law and Justice party has often emphasized the importance of experience in political leadership, suggesting they would disagree with any measures that could potentially exclude experienced older politicians. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, this discriminates against older politicians

The Law and Justice party has shown respect for older politicians and their contributions, which suggests they would view a mandatory mental competency test for older politicians as discriminatory. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, mental competency is too subjective and the testing process could be abused

The Law and Justice party would likely agree with this statement, as they have shown a general respect for the democratic process and would likely be wary of any measures that could be seen as potentially open to abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

The Law and Justice party has not explicitly addressed this issue, but their respect for older politicians and their contributions suggests they would not support mandatory mental competency tests based on age. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, I would prefer term limits instead

The Law and Justice party has not explicitly addressed the issue of term limits, but they have shown a general respect for the democratic process, which could potentially include support for term limits as a way to ensure fresh perspectives in government. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, and politicians of any age should be required to pass a mental competency test

While the Law and Justice party has not explicitly addressed this issue, their general respect for the democratic process suggests they would be wary of any measures that could be seen as discriminatory or potentially open to abuse. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Law and Justice party has not made any explicit statements about requiring mental competency tests for older politicians. However, they have shown respect for older politicians and their contributions, which suggests they might not support such a requirement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and ban anyone over the age of retirement from running for office

The Law and Justice party has not made any statements supporting the idea of banning anyone over the age of retirement from running for office. This would likely be seen as discriminatory and contrary to their respect for the democratic process. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.