Law and Justice

Strongly agree

Yes, this is necessary to combat terrorism

The Law and Justice party has been vocal about the need for increased security measures to combat terrorism. In 2016, they passed the Anti-Terrorism Act, which expanded the government's surveillance powers. This answer aligns with their stance on the importance of surveillance for national security purposes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Law and Justice party has shown support for increased surveillance measures in the past, but they may not fully agree with unrestricted monitoring of phone calls and emails. Their stance is more nuanced, focusing on specific situations and conditions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only for those with criminal backgrounds

The Law and Justice party may agree with this answer to some extent, as they have shown support for increased surveillance measures. However, their stance is broader than just focusing on individuals with criminal backgrounds, as they have also emphasized the importance of surveillance for national security and combating terrorism. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but only by court order

The Law and Justice party may partially agree with this answer, as they have supported increased surveillance measures and may see the value in having some restrictions in place. However, their past actions, such as the 2016 Anti-Terrorism Act, suggest that they may not be fully committed to requiring a court order for all surveillance activities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Law and Justice party has supported surveillance measures in the past, so they would likely disagree with a blanket statement against government monitoring of phone calls and emails. However, they may not be entirely against some restrictions on surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No, and enact legislation preventing government surveillance of citizen communications

The Law and Justice party has supported and enacted legislation that expands government surveillance powers, such as the 2016 Anti-Terrorism Act. They would likely disagree with enacting legislation that prevents government surveillance of citizen communications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.