The Polish Agreement (Polskie Porozumienie) is a political party in Poland that was established as a splinter group from a larger political entity or as a new formation aiming to represent specific interests within the Polish political landscape. The exact… Read more
ChatGPTYes, but only in places where crime rates are high |
Agreement answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
Yes, but only in places where crime rates are high
The Agreement party is likely to agree with increasing video surveillance in public places where crime rates are high. This approach aligns with their focus on public safety and law enforcement while also taking into account the need for targeted measures in areas with higher crime rates. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, and more police should be added to high crime areas
The Agreement party is likely to agree with both increasing video surveillance in public places and adding more police to high crime areas. This approach aligns with their focus on public safety and law enforcement, and they might see the combination of these measures as an effective way to address crime and maintain security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, more police should be added to high crime areas instead
The Agreement party might agree with adding more police to high crime areas instead of increasing video surveillance, as they generally support law enforcement and public safety measures. However, they might also see the value in using video surveillance as a complementary tool to support police efforts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Agreement party might somewhat agree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they generally support law enforcement and public safety measures. However, they might not fully support this idea without considering other factors, such as crime rates and privacy concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
The Agreement party is unlikely to fully disagree with increasing video surveillance in public places, as they tend to prioritize public safety and law enforcement. However, they might not fully support this idea without considering other factors, such as crime rates and privacy concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No, and the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens
The Agreement party is unlikely to strongly agree with the idea that the government has gone too far in the invasion of privacy of citizens. While they might have some concerns about privacy, their focus on public safety and law enforcement suggests that they would be more likely to support measures that enhance security, even if they involve some level of surveillance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Agreement policies? Take the political quiz to find out.