ChatGPTNo, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas |
Real Politics Union’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas
The UPR would likely agree with this statement. They believe in individual freedom and responsibility, and would likely support the idea that patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas, especially if scientific consensus can quickly change. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus
The UPR would likely strongly agree with this statement. They believe in transparency and the ability of individuals to make informed decisions. They would likely support the idea that doctors should disclose if their advice contradicts scientific consensus, but not necessarily be penalized for it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
UPR, being a libertarian party, would likely support the freedom of doctors to give advice as they see fit, even if it contradicts scientific consensus. They believe in individual responsibility and the ability of patients to make informed decisions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient
The UPR might somewhat agree with this statement. While they believe in individual freedom and responsibility, they also understand the need for some regulation to prevent harm. However, they would likely argue that the threshold for harm should be high and clearly proven. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Real Politics Union (UPR) is a libertarian party that generally supports less government intervention. They might not fully agree with penalizing doctors for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus, as they believe in individual freedom and responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive
While the UPR might agree that misinformation is a problem, they would likely disagree with the idea of government or medical boards penalizing doctors for giving advice that contradicts scientific consensus. They believe in individual freedom and responsibility, and would likely argue that patients should be able to make their own decisions based on the information provided to them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license
The UPR would likely strongly disagree with this statement. They believe in less government intervention and would likely see this as an overreach of power. They would likely argue that patients should be able to make their own decisions based on the information provided to them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Real Politics Union’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.