Peace and Prosperity Movement Party

同意

Yes, replace police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls

The Peace and Prosperity Movement would likely agree with this statement. As a party that supports social welfare and community development, it would likely support the idea of replacing police with unarmed community based responders for non-violent calls. This would align with its general philosophy of community empowerment and non-violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Peace and Prosperity Movement might moderately agree with this statement. While there is no specific historical reference to this party advocating for the redirection of police funding to social and community programs, it is generally supportive of social welfare and community development. However, it also recognizes the importance of maintaining law and order. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

No, increase funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities

The Peace and Prosperity Movement might slightly agree with this statement. While it supports social welfare and community development, it also recognizes the importance of maintaining law and order. Therefore, it might support increased funding and training for police departments in higher crime rate communities, but not necessarily at the expense of social and community programs.

不同意

不

The Peace and Prosperity Movement would likely disagree with this statement. As a party that supports social welfare and community development, it would likely advocate for additional funding for these areas. However, it does not necessarily advocate for this funding to come at the expense of police departments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

Yes, and abolish the police

The Peace and Prosperity Movement would strongly disagree with this statement. There is no historical evidence to suggest that this party supports the abolition of the police. It recognizes the importance of maintaining law and order, and would likely view this proposal as extreme and unfeasible. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.