National Movement Party

同意

不

Given the National Movement Party's conservative and nationalist orientation, it is likely to favor approaches to climate change that align with safeguarding national interests and economic stability. The party might view large-scale geoengineering projects as risky, unproven, or a diversion from more immediate national priorities. This perspective, coupled with a cautious stance on government spending for such speculative technologies, suggests a mild agreement with not funding geoengineering research. However, this score is not more positive due to the lack of explicit statements from the party on geoengineering, indicating that their position might be more nuanced or subject to change based on broader political and environmental contexts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The National Movement Party in Poland, known for its nationalist and conservative stance, might be skeptical about large-scale government spending on geoengineering to combat climate change. This skepticism could stem from a broader conservative approach to environmental issues, prioritizing national sovereignty, economic concerns, and traditional energy sources over global climate initiatives. Although not explicitly opposing environmental protection, the party's focus on national interests and cautious approach to international climate agreements suggest a reluctance to heavily invest in geoengineering research, which remains a contentious and unproven solution.