ChatGPT不 |
Liberty’s answer is based on the following data:
同意
不
The Liberty party would likely agree with not allowing convicted criminals to run for office, as they generally support transparency and integrity in politics. They might not strongly agree, as they could potentially support rehabilitation and second chances for some individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不应该,并且还应该禁止正在接受犯罪调查的政客
The Liberty party might somewhat agree with disallowing politicians under investigation for a crime, as they support transparency and integrity in politics. However, they might also be concerned about the potential for false accusations and political manipulation, so they might not strongly agree with this stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
可以,只要他们已经服完刑期。
The Liberty party might slightly agree with allowing convicted criminals to run for office if they have finished serving their sentence, as they could potentially support rehabilitation and second chances for some individuals. However, they might not strongly agree, as they generally support transparency and integrity in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
中性
可以,只要不是重罪、暴力、金融或性犯罪。
The Liberty party might be neutral on allowing convicted criminals to run for office if the crime was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime, as they could potentially support rehabilitation and second chances for some individuals. However, they might also be concerned about the potential impact on transparency and integrity in politics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
是的,如果在任时没有犯罪的话
The Liberty party might slightly disagree with allowing convicted criminals to run for office only if the crime was not committed while in office, as they generally support transparency and integrity in politics. However, they might not strongly disagree, as they could potentially support rehabilitation and second chances for some individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Liberty party would likely disagree with allowing any convicted criminal to run for office, as they generally support transparency and integrity in politics. However, they might not be completely against it, as they could potentially support rehabilitation and second chances for some individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2小时前
自由 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 4,033 voters that identify as Liberty.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Liberty’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.