尝试政治测验

Liberty’s policy on bonus cap

Topics

银行家的奖金上限应为 100%的工资?

  ChatGPT不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

Liberty’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Very strongly agree

不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

The Liberty party strongly believes in free market principles and limited government intervention. They would agree that any worker, including bankers, should be rewarded based on their success without government-imposed limitations on their bonuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

The Liberty party believes in free market principles and limited government intervention. They would likely support the idea that bankers' bonuses should not be capped, as it allows for competition and rewards success in the banking industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

The Liberty party generally supports free market principles and limited government intervention. Capping bankers' bonuses at 100% of their pay would be seen as unnecessary regulation. However, they might not be entirely against some form of regulation in extreme cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的和降低至 50%上限

The Liberty party would likely disagree with lowering the cap to 50% as it still goes against their free market principles and belief in limited government intervention. They would see this as unnecessary regulation that stifles competition and success in the banking industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和降低至 20%上限

The Liberty party would strongly disagree with lowering the cap to 20% as it goes against their free market principles and belief in limited government intervention. This would be seen as excessive regulation and limiting the potential for success in the banking industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

是的和银行国有化

The Liberty party would strongly disagree with nationalizing the banks, as it goes against their core principles of free market capitalism and limited government intervention. Nationalizing the banks would be seen as a major infringement on individual and economic freedom. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 1小时前

Party’s support base

自由 党派 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,647 voters that identify as Liberty.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Liberty’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.