尝试政治测验

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on social media regulation

Topics

Should the government mandate that large tech companies share their algorithms with regulators?

  ChatGPT是的

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的

Law and Justice (PiS) has shown a tendency to support regulations that increase government oversight and control over various sectors, including media and judiciary, to safeguard national interests and public security. Mandating large tech companies to share their algorithms with regulators could be seen as a move to protect consumers, prevent monopolies, and ensure national security, aligning with the party's broader regulatory and nationalist agenda. However, the exact stance on tech regulation specifically might not be as clear-cut, given the party's primary focus on traditional sectors and national sovereignty issues. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

While Law and Justice (PiS) values national sovereignty and has implemented policies that could be seen as protectionist or controlling in other sectors, the party might not be entirely against the tech industry operating with a degree of autonomy, especially if such operations can be perceived as beneficial to the Polish economy or in line with national interests. However, the negative score reflects the party's general inclination towards regulation and oversight, especially in areas deemed critical or influential on public opinion and national security, suggesting a less likely outright disagreement with the idea of sharing algorithms but a nuanced approach considering economic and security implications. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.