尝试政治测验

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on mental health

Topics

政府应该增加对精神健康研究和治疗的资金投入吗?

  ChatGPT应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

应该,我们的精神健康护理系统需要更多资金以提供更高质量的关怀和服务

The Law and Justice party would likely agree with this statement, as they have shown support for improving the quality of healthcare in Poland. For example, they have increased healthcare spending and introduced the 'Medicine for the Senior' program, which provides free medication for seniors. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Law and Justice party has shown some support for increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, but it is not their primary focus. They have been more focused on social welfare programs and national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是只应增加个性化护理方面的资金,而不是资助制药公司

The Law and Justice party might somewhat agree with this statement, as they have shown support for personalized care in healthcare. However, there is not enough evidence to suggest that they would specifically prioritize personalized care over subsidizing pharmaceutical companies in the context of mental health research and treatment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不应该,而是应该鼓励私营公司来解决这一问题

The Law and Justice party has not been strongly in favor of incentivizing private companies to address mental health issues. They have focused more on increasing public spending for healthcare and social welfare programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

The Law and Justice party is not strongly against increasing funding for mental health research and treatment, but they may prioritize other issues. They have not explicitly opposed such funding, but their focus has been on other areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 2天前

Party’s support base

法律与公正 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 2,019 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.