法律与公正

Strongly agree

Yes, this will decrease the amount of misinformation patients receive

The Law and Justice party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support measures that would decrease misinformation and increase the quality of healthcare. However, they have not explicitly stated this position, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Law and Justice party generally supports the idea of maintaining professional standards in the medical field, which would include penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus. However, they have not explicitly stated this position, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, but the doctors should be required to disclose that the advice contradicts contemporary scientific consensus

The Law and Justice party might agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general support for transparency and professional standards in the medical field. However, they have not explicitly stated this position, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

No, only when the advice was proven to harm the patient

The Law and Justice party might agree with this statement to some extent, as they generally support maintaining professional standards in the medical field. However, they have not explicitly stated this position, and it might be seen as too lenient in some cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and the doctors should also lose their medical license

While the Law and Justice party supports professional standards, they have not explicitly advocated for such severe penalties as revoking medical licenses. They might agree with this in extreme cases, but it is not a central part of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

No, scientific consensus can quickly change and patients should be allowed to try unconventional ideas

The Law and Justice party generally supports the idea of maintaining professional standards in the medical field, which would not typically include allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus. However, they might be open to some flexibility in this area, hence the score is not at the maximum negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不

Given their general support for professional standards in the medical field, it is unlikely that the Law and Justice party would support allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus without any penalties.