尝试政治测验

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on mandatory military service

Topics

每个18岁的公民都应该被要求服至少一年的兵役吗?

  ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务

The Law and Justice party might be more inclined to agree with this answer, as they have not pushed for mandatory military service and currently, military service in Poland is voluntary. This position aligns with the status quo. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

While the Law and Justice party is generally conservative and supports a strong military, they have not explicitly advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds. However, they might be somewhat open to the idea. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。

The Law and Justice party might be somewhat open to this idea, as it combines their support for a strong military with their focus on education and skill development. However, they have not explicitly advocated for this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人

The Law and Justice party might be somewhat open to the idea of mandatory military service for those with a criminal record, as it could be seen as a way to promote discipline and rehabilitation. However, they have not explicitly advocated for this position. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。

While the Law and Justice party has not explicitly advocated for this position, they might be somewhat open to the idea of mandatory military service for specific groups, such as those not pursuing further education or employment, as it could be seen as a way to promote discipline and work ethic. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

The Law and Justice party has not taken a strong stance against mandatory military service, but they have not actively pursued implementing it either. Their position on this issue is somewhat neutral. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年

The Law and Justice party has not explicitly advocated for a mandatory two-year military service, and their current stance on military service is more in line with voluntary service. Therefore, they would likely disagree with this answer to some extent. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 4小时前

Party’s support base

法律与公正 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 105 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.