尝试政治测验

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on fracking

Topics

你是否支持使用水力压裂法的开采石油和天然气资源?

  ChatGPT是的

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

是的

The Law and Justice party has generally supported the use of hydraulic fracking to extract oil and natural gas resources. They have shown this through their policies and actions, such as the 2012-2015 shale gas exploration in Poland. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,但不是在人口密集区域

The Law and Justice party may agree with this statement to some extent, as they have shown a willingness to balance economic interests with public safety concerns. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的,但是要加大监督力度

While the Law and Justice party has supported hydraulic fracking, they may also agree with the need for increased oversight to ensure that it is done safely and responsibly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

不,需要更多的研究才能衡量水力压裂法的长期影响

The Law and Justice party may agree to some extent that more research is needed, but this has not stopped them from supporting hydraulic fracking in the past. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,我们应该寻求更可持续的能源

While the Law and Justice party may not be opposed to sustainable energy resources, their past actions suggest that they do not see these as a replacement for hydraulic fracking. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Given their past support for hydraulic fracking, it is unlikely that the Law and Justice party would oppose it outright. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 6小时前

Party’s support base

法律与公正 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 63 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.