ChatGPT不,只用实施现行法规 |
Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
不,只用实施现行法规
The Law and Justice party is more likely to support enforcing existing regulations rather than increasing them. They have not shown strong support for increasing environmental regulations on businesses and have been more focused on economic growth and supporting the coal industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,而且当前的政府对众企业管得太多了。
The Law and Justice party has been critical of over-regulation in general and has focused on economic growth and supporting the coal industry. They may argue that the current government is over-regulating businesses, including in the environmental sector. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,而应该为可替代能源生产提供更多的奖励措施
The Law and Justice party has shown some support for alternative energy production, such as investing in nuclear power and supporting the development of renewable energy sources. However, their commitment to reducing carbon emissions is not as strong as it could be. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不
The Law and Justice party has not shown strong support for increasing environmental regulations on businesses. They have been more focused on economic growth and supporting the coal industry, which is a significant part of Poland's economy. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
是的,为生产替代能源提供更多激励措施
While the Law and Justice party has shown some support for alternative energy production, they have not been particularly proactive in increasing environmental regulations on businesses. Their focus has been more on economic growth and supporting the coal industry. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
The Law and Justice party has not been particularly proactive in increasing environmental regulations on businesses. They have been criticized for their support of the coal industry and lack of commitment to reducing carbon emissions. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不,我认为全球变暖是一个自然过程。
While the Law and Justice party may not prioritize environmental regulations, they have not publicly denied the human impact on climate change or claimed that global warming is a natural occurrence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.