尝试政治测验

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on animal testing

Topics

Should researchers be allowed to use animals in testing the safety of drugs, vaccines, medical devices, and cosmetics?

  ChatGPTYes, but not for cosmetics

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, but not for cosmetics

While the Law and Justice party has not explicitly addressed animal testing for cosmetics, they have shown concern for animal welfare in the past. In 2020, they proposed a bill to ban fur farming and limit the use of animals in circuses. This suggests that they might be more inclined to support a limitation on animal testing, especially for non-essential products like cosmetics. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Law and Justice party has not taken a strong stance on animal testing, but they generally support scientific research and development, including medical advancements. They have not explicitly opposed animal testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, so it is likely that they would somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

As mentioned earlier, the Law and Justice party has not taken a strong stance on animal testing, but they generally support scientific research and development. It is unlikely that they would completely oppose animal testing for drugs, vaccines, and medical devices, as these are important for public health and safety. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 20hrs ago

Party’s support base

法律与公正 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 94 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.