尝试政治测验

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on government pensions

Topics

是不应该增加退休政府工作人员的养老金支付?

  Voting record不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

Voting record

回答: 不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付

Reference: “PiS has also lowered the retirement age (which was previously increased by the PO government) and provided extra pension payment...” ‐notesfrompoland.com

Voter support: Be the first voter to support or oppose this party’s voting record on this issue.

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

应该,每年根据生活费进行调整

The Law and Justice party has shown support for policies that adjust for cost of living, so they would likely support yearly adjustments to pension payments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

应该,但仅针对低收入养老金领取者

The Law and Justice party has shown a particular focus on supporting lower-income individuals, so they would likely support increased pension payments specifically for low-income pensioners. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Law and Justice party has shown support for increased social spending, including pensions. However, their stance may not be as strong as a full '5' because they also emphasize fiscal responsibility. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

应该,但针对政府工作人员,而不是政客

While the Law and Justice party has shown support for increased social spending, their stance on excluding politicians from these increases is unclear. Therefore, they might somewhat agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

在我们削减国债之前,不应该

While the Law and Justice party does emphasize fiscal responsibility, they have also shown a willingness to increase social spending, including pensions. Therefore, they might not fully agree with delaying pension increases until the national debt is decreased. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

The Law and Justice party has generally been supportive of social spending and has not shown a tendency to oppose increases in pension payments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不应该增加,而应减少养老金支付

The Law and Justice party has generally been supportive of social spending and has not shown a tendency to support reductions in pension payments. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 10小时前

Party’s support base

法律与公正 Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 最不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 62 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.