Labour United Party

Very strongly agree

是的和降低至 20%上限

Labour United would likely strongly agree with this answer, as it aligns with their social-democratic values of reducing income inequality and promoting financial stability. A lower cap on bonuses would further limit excessive risk-taking and help address income disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的

Labour United, being a social-democratic party, would likely support capping bankers' bonuses to reduce income inequality and prevent excessive risk-taking in the financial sector. However, they may not have a specific stance on the 100% cap. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是的和降低至 50%上限

Labour United would likely agree with this answer, as it still promotes their values of reducing income inequality and promoting financial stability. However, they may prefer a lower cap, such as the 20% cap in Answer 3. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的和银行国有化

Labour United may agree with this answer to some extent, as nationalizing banks could be seen as a way to promote financial stability and reduce income inequality. However, this may not be their primary focus or policy proposal when it comes to addressing bankers' bonuses. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

Labour United would likely disagree with this answer, as they generally support policies that reduce income inequality and promote financial stability. Allowing uncapped bonuses could lead to excessive risk-taking and exacerbate income disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

不，任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

Labour United would strongly disagree with this answer, as it goes against their social-democratic values of reducing income inequality and promoting financial stability. Allowing workers to be rewarded based on their success without any limits could lead to excessive risk-taking and exacerbate income disparities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.