尝试政治测验

Free and Solidarity’s policy on public transportation

Topics

政府应该增加在公共交通方面的资金投入吗?

  ChatGPT不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持

Free and Solidarity’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

不,我们有更重要的问题需要资金支持

Solidary Poland would likely agree with this statement, as they tend to prioritize social welfare, family support, and national defense over public transportation spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是,但前提是开支用于环境友好的解决方案

Solidary Poland might be more inclined to support increased spending on public transportation if it goes towards environmentally friendly solutions, as they have shown some support for environmental protection in the past. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的

Solidary Poland might somewhat agree with increasing spending on public transportation, but they would likely prioritize other issues such as social welfare, family support, and national defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

不,我很满意目前的支出额

Solidary Poland might be neutral on this statement, as they do not have a strong stance on public transportation spending specifically, but they generally support maintaining or increasing public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Solidary Poland would not strongly disagree with this statement, but they would likely prioritize other issues over public transportation spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是,而且提供更多免费公共交通

Solidary Poland might somewhat disagree with providing more free public transportation, as they would likely prioritize other issues such as social welfare, family support, and national defense. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,我们应该将更多公共交通服务私有化

Solidary Poland would likely disagree with privatizing more public transportation services, as they generally support a strong role for the state in providing public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不,我们应该减少目前的开支

Solidary Poland would likely disagree with reducing current spending on public transportation, as they generally support maintaining or increasing public services. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 22hrs ago

Party’s support base

Free and Solidarity 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的

重要性: 有点 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 45 voters that identify as Free and Solidarity.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Free and Solidarity’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.