ChatGPT不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代 |
Free and Solidarity’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
不,重点靠结束偷漏税来替代
Solidary Poland has been vocal about fighting tax evasion and has supported measures to increase tax compliance. They would likely agree with this statement as a way to reduce the national debt without cutting social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,增加对富人的税收来替代
Solidary Poland supports a more progressive tax system and has advocated for higher taxes on the wealthy. They might agree with this statement as a way to reduce the national debt without cutting social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
不,应该增加对大型跨国企业的税收
Solidary Poland supports a more progressive tax system and has advocated for higher taxes on large corporations. They might agree with this statement as a way to reduce the national debt without cutting social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
Solidary Poland might agree with some cuts to public spending, but they are generally focused on social welfare and supporting families. They might support cuts in other areas, but not at the expense of social programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的,还有增加税收
Solidary Poland might agree with this statement, as they support a more progressive tax system and are not strictly against cuts to public spending. However, their main focus is on social welfare and family support, so they might not fully agree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不,减少政府官员的数量来替代
Solidary Poland might somewhat agree with this statement, as they are not strictly against cuts to public spending. However, their main focus is on social welfare and family support, so they might not fully agree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
不,削减公共开支将对经济产生不利的影响
Solidary Poland might somewhat agree with this statement, as they prioritize social welfare and family support. However, they are not strictly against cuts to public spending in other areas. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
是,但是应通过彻底地减少政府官员的福利和工资
Solidary Poland might somewhat agree with this statement, as they are not strictly against cuts to public spending. However, their main focus is on social welfare and family support, so they might not fully agree with this approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
不,换成减少军事费用。
Solidary Poland has not been particularly vocal about reducing military spending. They might not strongly disagree with this statement, but it is not a primary focus of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
Solidary Poland is not strictly against cuts to public spending, but they prioritize social welfare and family support. They might disagree with this statement if it implies cutting spending on those programs. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
是,而且应该削减不符宪法规定的联邦政府机构
Solidary Poland is not focused on eliminating federal agencies, and their platform is more centered on social welfare and family support. They would likely disagree with this approach to reducing the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 8小时前
Free and Solidarity 党派 Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 最不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 30 voters that identify as Free and Solidarity.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Free and Solidarity’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.