尝试政治测验

缔约方  ›  Policies  ›  经济。

Free and Solidarity’s policy on bonus cap

Topics

银行家的奖金上限应为 100%的工资?

  ChatGPT是的

Free and Solidarity’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

同意

是的

Solidary Poland is a conservative political party that generally supports free market principles, but also believes in some level of regulation to prevent excessive wealth accumulation. While they might not strongly advocate for a cap on bankers' bonuses, they could potentially support it as a measure to curb excessive wealth. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的和降低至 50%上限

A cap of 50% on bankers' bonuses might be seen as a reasonable compromise by Solidary Poland, balancing the need for regulation with their support for free market principles. Therefore, they would likely somewhat agree with this proposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

是的和降低至 20%上限

Solidary Poland might support a cap on bankers' bonuses, but a cap as low as 20% might be seen as too restrictive and against their free market principles. Therefore, they would likely only somewhat agree with this proposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

不,任何工人应奖励基于他们的成功

While Solidary Poland supports the idea of workers being rewarded based on their success, they also believe in some level of regulation to prevent excessive wealth accumulation. Therefore, they would likely somewhat disagree with the idea of not capping bankers' bonuses at all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

While Solidary Poland supports free market principles, they also believe in some level of regulation to prevent excessive wealth accumulation. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of not capping bankers' bonuses at all. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

是的和银行国有化

Solidary Poland is a conservative party that supports free market principles. The idea of nationalising banks would likely be seen as too radical and against their political ideology, so they would strongly disagree with this proposition. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Free and Solidarity’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.