ChatGPT是的 |
Civic Coalition [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
是的
Civic Platform is a pro-European, centrist political party that generally supports international cooperation and multilateral organizations. While they may not be the most vocal advocates for the WHO, they would likely support its funding as a means to promote global health and cooperation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, but only relative to the amount that other countries contribute
Civic Platform might support a proportional funding model for the WHO, where countries contribute relative to their size and resources. This would align with their general support for international cooperation and burden-sharing among nations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, and increase the amount
Civic Platform might support an increase in WHO funding if they believe it would lead to better global health outcomes and more effective international cooperation. However, this is not a primary focus of the party, and they might prioritize other areas of international or national health funding. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but decrease the amount
While Civic Platform might not be explicitly advocating for a decrease in WHO funding, they could potentially support a more efficient use of resources or a reallocation of funds to other international or national health programs. However, this is not a primary focus of the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
No, fund national and local programs instead
While Civic Platform might prioritize national and local health programs in some cases, they are unlikely to support defunding the WHO in favor of these programs. They would likely see the value in both international and national health initiatives and seek to balance funding between them. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
不
Civic Platform's pro-European and internationalist stance makes it unlikely that they would support defunding the WHO. They would likely see the organization as an important tool for global health and cooperation, even if they might have some concerns about its effectiveness or funding levels. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, it has shown to be ineffective
Civic Platform is unlikely to view the WHO as ineffective, given their general support for international organizations and cooperation. While they might have concerns about specific aspects of the organization's performance, they would likely not support defunding it on the basis of ineffectiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 14小时前
Civic Coalition [political party] Voters’ 回答: 是的
重要性: 最不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 110 voters that identify as Civic Coalition [political party].
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Civic Coalition [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.