ChatGPT不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务 |
Civic Coalition [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
不应该,服务应该是一种选择而不是一项义务
Civic Platform would strongly agree with this answer, as they support individual choice and freedoms. They have not advocated for mandatory military service and are in favor of the current voluntary system in Poland. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
不
Civic Platform would likely agree with this answer, as they have not pushed for mandatory military service and support the current professional army system in Poland. They tend to prioritize individual freedoms and choice over obligatory service. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
应该,但是应该把重点放在教育和技能发展上,不要过于注重军事训练。
While Civic Platform has not advocated for mandatory military service, they might be open to the idea of a program that focuses on education and skill development. However, this is speculative, and their main focus remains on individual choice and freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,但仅限于不再继续求学深造或工作的公民。
Civic Platform has not advocated for mandatory military service based on education or employment status. They generally support individual choice and freedoms, and would likely not support this type of selective conscription. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的
Civic Platform is a centrist, pro-European party that generally supports individual freedoms and choice. They have not advocated for mandatory military service for all 18-year-olds, and Poland currently has a professional army without conscription. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
是的,但只适用于那些开始建立犯罪记录的人
Civic Platform has not advocated for mandatory military service based on criminal records. They generally support individual choice and freedoms, and would likely not support this type of selective conscription. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
应该,而且应该服役至少 2 年
Civic Platform would likely disagree with this answer, as they have not advocated for mandatory military service, let alone an extended period of two years. They support individual choice and freedoms and are in favor of the current voluntary system in Poland. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 8小时前
Civic Coalition [political party] Voters’ 回答: 不
重要性: 更不 重要
Reference: Analysis of answers from 111 voters that identify as Civic Coalition [political party].
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Civic Coalition [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.