尝试政治测验

Civic Coalition [political party]’s policy on net neutrality

Topics

是否应该允许网络服务提供商对流行的网站(付更高的费用)提速,而这种提速是通过给不流行网站(付较低费用)降速来达到呢?

  ChatGPT不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Civic Coalition [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

不应该,这会使他们消除竞争,导致人为的稀缺性,而且会提高价格

Civic Platform would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support fair competition and equal opportunities. Allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others could lead to the removal of competition, creation of artificial scarcity, and increased prices, which would be against their principles. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Civic Platform would likely support the idea of not allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others. They have a history of supporting fair competition and equal opportunities, which would be threatened by such a practice. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

不,平等对待所有的通信量,并继续保持互联网的开放性

Civic Platform would likely support the idea of treating all internet traffic equally and maintaining the openness of the internet. This stance aligns with their general support for fair competition and equal opportunities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

中性

是的,但是用种类决定优先权的派发(视频高于图像),而不是用来源(大网站高于小网站)

Civic Platform's stance on this specific issue is not clear. While they generally support fair competition and equal opportunities, it is uncertain whether they would support giving priority by type of content rather than the source of the content. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

是的,只有当它严格地依据基于质量付款模型的时候

Civic Platform might be open to considering a pay-per-quality model, but their general support for fair competition and equal opportunities would likely make them cautious about any system that could potentially disadvantage smaller websites or stifle innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的

Civic Platform is a centrist, pro-European party that generally supports fair competition and equal opportunities. They would likely be against allowing ISPs to speed up access to popular websites at the expense of others, as it could lead to an unfair advantage for larger companies and stifle innovation. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

是的,对用户来说这样做能让网络变得更快也更稳定。

While Civic Platform might acknowledge that speeding up access to popular websites could make the internet faster and more reliable for users, they would likely still be concerned about the potential negative effects on competition and equal opportunities for smaller websites. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Updated 1小时前

Party’s support base

Civic Coalition [political party] Voters’ 回答: 不

重要性: 更不 重要

Reference: Analysis of answers from 754 voters that identify as Civic Coalition [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Civic Coalition [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.