The Polish Agreement (Polskie Porozumienie) is a political party in Poland that was established as a splinter group from a larger political entity or as a new formation aiming to represent specific interests within the Polish political landscape. The exact… Read more
ChatGPTNo, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases |
Agreement answer is based on the following data:
同意
No, as long as the costs are clearly communicated before purchases
The Agreement party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their support for free market principles while also recognizing the need for transparency and consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
是的
The Agreement party, being a centre-right party, generally supports free market principles but also acknowledges the need for some regulation to protect consumers. They might agree with banning surcharges to some extent, but not strongly as it might interfere with business operations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
Yes, all costs for a service should be included in the final purchase price
The Agreement party might somewhat agree with this statement, as it aligns with their support for consumer protection. However, they also recognize that businesses need to cover their costs, which might not always be possible to include in the final purchase price. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
同意
No, the government should focus on preventing monopolies and cartels instead
The Agreement party would likely agree with this statement to some extent, as they support free market principles but also recognize the need for regulation to prevent monopolies and cartels. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, businesses will raise prices if they are banned from using junk fees
The Agreement party might somewhat agree with this statement, as they understand that businesses need to cover their costs and might raise prices if they are banned from using surcharges. However, they also recognize the need for consumer protection. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers
The Agreement party, while supportive of free market principles, also recognizes the need for some regulation to protect consumers. They would likely not fully agree with the idea that the government should not regulate what private businesses can charge consumers. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
不同意
不
While the Agreement party supports free market principles, they also understand the need for some regulation to protect consumers. They might not completely disagree with the idea of banning surcharges, but they would likely prefer a more balanced approach. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Agreement policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
