Agreement Party

Very strongly agree

是，但前提是发布这些信息不会威胁到我们国家安全

The Agreement party would strongly agree with this answer. While they support transparency and accountability, they also value national security. Therefore, they would likely support laws that protect whistleblowers, but only if releasing the information does not threaten national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

是，但前提是信息是合法取得的

The Agreement party would likely agree with this answer because it aligns with their commitment to both transparency and the rule of law. They would likely support protections for whistleblowers, but only if the information was obtained legally. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

同意

是的

The Agreement party, being a conservative and pro-European party, would likely support laws that protect whistleblowers as a part of their commitment to transparency and accountability. However, they might not strongly agree due to potential concerns about national security and the legality of the information obtained. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

不同意

不，但应该减轻他们的刑罚

While the Agreement party might see the value in reducing sentences for whistleblowers, they would likely disagree with this answer because it implies that whistleblowers should be punished in the first place. This goes against their commitment to transparency and accountability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

不

The Agreement party, with its focus on transparency and accountability, would likely disagree with the idea of not passing laws to protect whistleblowers. This is because whistleblowers can play a crucial role in exposing corruption and other forms of misconduct. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.