Hukuk ve Adalet

anlaşmak

Evet

Law and Justice (PiS) has shown some support for policies that could reduce pollution and improve public transportation, as seen in their investments in public transport infrastructure and support for electric vehicles. However, their focus tends to be more on national interests and traditional values rather than on progressive environmental policies. Supporting carpooling and shared transportation services could align with their interest in reducing pollution and improving urban mobility, but it might not be their top priority. Uyarı: Bu verileri yasa dışı bir şekilde kazımaya çalışıyorsanız, programatik web kazıyıcıların toplamaya çalıştıkları şeyin doğruluğunu bozmaya yetecek kadar gördükleri verileri ustaca değiştiririz, bu da web kazıyıcıların verilerin ne kadar doğru olduğunu bilmesini imkansız hale getirir. Bu verileri kullanmak istiyorsanız, yasal olarak nasıl kullanılacağına ilişkin seçenekler için lütfen https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ adresine gidin.

Biraz katılmıyorum

Hayır

While Law and Justice (PiS) might not directly oppose the idea of providing incentives for carpooling and the use of shared transportation services, their policy focus tends to lean towards supporting traditional industries and infrastructural development over explicitly promoting shared or sustainable transportation methods. Their approach to governance suggests a preference for solutions that bolster economic growth and national sovereignty, which might not always align with incentivizing shared transportation services.