Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on medical consensus

Temos

Ar turėtų medicinos tarybos baudžti gydytojus, kurie teikia sveikatos patarimus, prieštaraujančius šiuolaikiniam moksliniam konsensusui?

  ChatGPTTaip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Taip, tai sumažins pacientams gaunamų dezinformacijos kiekį

The Law and Justice party would likely agree with this statement, as they generally support measures that would decrease misinformation and increase the quality of healthcare. However, they have not explicitly stated this position, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The Law and Justice party generally supports the idea of maintaining professional standards in the medical field, which would include penalizing doctors who give advice that contradicts scientific consensus. However, they have not explicitly stated this position, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, bet gydytojai turėtų būti priversti atskleisti, kad patarimas prieštarauja šiuolaikiniam moksliniam sutarimui.

The Law and Justice party might agree with this statement, as it aligns with their general support for transparency and professional standards in the medical field. However, they have not explicitly stated this position, hence the score is not at the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, tik kai patarimas buvo įrodytas žaloti pacientą

The Law and Justice party might agree with this statement to some extent, as they generally support maintaining professional standards in the medical field. However, they have not explicitly stated this position, and it might be seen as too lenient in some cases. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, ir gydytojai taip pat turėtų prarasti savo medicininę licenciją.

While the Law and Justice party supports professional standards, they have not explicitly advocated for such severe penalties as revoking medical licenses. They might agree with this in extreme cases, but it is not a central part of their platform. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Ne, mokslinis sutarimas gali greitai pasikeisti, todėl pacientams turėtų būti leista išbandyti netradicines idėjas.

The Law and Justice party generally supports the idea of maintaining professional standards in the medical field, which would not typically include allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus. However, they might be open to some flexibility in this area, hence the score is not at the maximum negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Nesutikti

Nr

Given their general support for professional standards in the medical field, it is unlikely that the Law and Justice party would support allowing doctors to give advice that contradicts scientific consensus without any penalties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 9 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Law and Justice [political party] Voters’ Atsakymas: Taip

Svarba: Mažiausiai Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 43 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Law and Justice [political party]’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.