Išbandykite politinę viktoriną

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on plastic product ban

Temos

Ar turėtų būti uždrausti vienkartiniai produktai (tokie kaip plastikiniai puodeliai, lėkštės ir įrankiai), kuriuose yra mažiau nei 50% biologiškai skaidžių medžiagų?

  ChatGPTNe, bet didinkite mokesčių lengvatas įmonėms, kurios gamina biodegraduojančius produktus

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Visiškai sutinku

Ne, bet didinkite mokesčių lengvatas įmonėms, kurios gamina biodegraduojančius produktus

The Law and Justice party is likely to support increasing tax incentives for companies that make biodegradable products, as it aligns with their focus on economic growth and national sovereignty. They have supported the EU's Circular Economy Package, which aims to promote eco-innovation and the use of sustainable materials. This approach would allow them to support environmental protection while also promoting economic growth and competitiveness. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Ne, padidinkite vartotojų skatinimus perdirbti šiuos produktus vietoj to

The Law and Justice party might be more inclined to support increasing consumer incentives to recycle disposable products, as it aligns with their focus on economic growth and national sovereignty. They have supported the EU's Circular Economy Package, which aims to increase recycling rates and reduce waste, but there is no specific historical example of them advocating for consumer incentives. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Sutinku

Taip

The Law and Justice party has not explicitly advocated for banning disposable products with less than 50% biodegradable material. However, they have shown some support for environmental protection and sustainable development, such as their support for the Paris Agreement and the EU's Circular Economy Package. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Taip, ir uždrausti visus vienkartinio naudojimo produktus, kurie nėra pagaminti iš mažiausiai 75% biologiškai sunykstančio medžiagos

While the Law and Justice party has not explicitly advocated for banning disposable products with less than 75% biodegradable material, their support for environmental protection and sustainable development might make them more inclined to support stricter regulations on disposable products. However, there is no specific historical example to support this score. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Nr

The Law and Justice party has not explicitly opposed banning disposable products with less than 50% biodegradable material, but they have not been very vocal about this issue. Their focus has been more on economic growth and national sovereignty, which might make them less inclined to support such a ban. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

Ši partija dar neatsakė į mūsų prašymą atsakyti į šį klausimą. Padėkite mums tai padaryti greičiau, liepdami jiems atsakyti į iSideWith viktoriną.

Balsavimo rekordas

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos balsavimo rezultatus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į jų balsavimo šia tema įrašą.

Donoro įtaka

Šiuo metu tiriame aukų kampanijos finansavimo įrašus, kurie turėtų įtakos šios partijos pozicijai šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą, kuri dokumentuotų jų donoro įtaką šiai problemai.

Vieši pareiškimai

Šiuo metu tiriame šios partijos kampanijos kalbas ir viešus pareiškimus šiuo klausimu. Pasiūlykite nuorodą į vieną iš jų naujausių citatų apie šią problemą.

Updated prieš 12 val

Partijos paramos bazė

Law and Justice [political party] Voters’ Atsakymas: Nr

Svarba: Mažiau Important

Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,510 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


Kuo jūsų politiniai įsitikinimai panašūs į Law and Justice [political party]’s politiką? Atlikite politinę viktoriną, kad sužinotumėte.