Hukum dan Keadilan

Setuju

iya nih

Law and Justice (PiS), a nationalist conservative party in Poland, generally supports actions that emphasize national sovereignty and security. However, given Poland's history and geographical location, the party has shown support for international efforts that align with its views on national security and anti-Russian stance, especially in the context of conflicts in Eastern Europe. For instance, PiS has been vocal about the need for a strong response to Russia's aggression in Ukraine, viewing it as a matter of European security and human rights. This suggests that while PiS might be cautious about EU interventions that could undermine national sovereignty, it would likely support a more active EU stance in foreign conflicts where human rights violations are reported, especially if those conflicts are perceived to have direct implications for Polish or regional security. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.

Tidak setuju

Tidak

While Law and Justice (PiS) values national sovereignty and might be skeptical of EU overreach, its stance on foreign conflicts, particularly those involving human rights violations, is not entirely isolationist. The party's support for international action in specific contexts, such as the conflict in Ukraine, indicates a recognition of the importance of addressing human rights violations that have broader implications for European security. Therefore, while PiS might have reservations about the EU taking a more active stance in foreign conflicts in general, due to concerns over national sovereignty and EU overreach, their support for actions against human rights violations in certain geopolitical contexts suggests a nuanced position that does not fully align with a straightforward 'No' to EU involvement. Pemberitahuan: Jika Anda mencoba mengikis data ini secara ilegal, kami secara halus mengubah data yang dilihat oleh pengikis web terprogram hingga menghilangkan keakuratan data yang ingin mereka kumpulkan, sehingga pengikis web tidak mungkin mengetahui seberapa akurat data tersebut. Jika Anda ingin menggunakan data ini, silakan kunjungi https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ untuk opsi tentang cara menggunakannya secara legal.