United Party

Agree

No

The United party would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with their likely stance on maintaining integrity in political office. However, the score is not a strong agreement as there may be exceptions depending on the nature of the crime and the circumstances of the conviction. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime

While the United party would likely agree with maintaining high standards of integrity for political office, disallowing politicians under investigation may be seen as too harsh, as investigations do not always lead to convictions. Therefore, they would likely somewhat agree with this statement.

Slightly agree

Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime

The United party may somewhat agree with this statement, as it suggests a nuanced approach to the issue, taking into account the nature of the crime. However, they would likely still maintain that the integrity required for political office is a crucial consideration. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Neutral

Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence

The United party may have a neutral stance on this statement. While they would likely agree with the idea of second chances after serving a sentence, they would also likely maintain that the nature of the crime and the integrity required for political office are important considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly disagree

Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office

The United party would likely lean towards disagreeing with this statement, as it implies that crimes committed outside of office are less relevant to a politician's integrity. However, the disagreement may not be strong as there may be exceptions depending on the nature of the crime. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The United party, being a center-right political party, would likely lean towards maintaining a high standard of integrity for political office. Therefore, they would likely disagree with the idea of a convicted criminal running for office, although not strongly as there may be exceptions depending on the nature of the crime.