Try the political quiz

People’s Party [political party]’s policy on hate speech

Topics

Should hate speech be protected by freedom of speech laws?

  ChatGPTYes, as long as it does not threaten violence

People’s Party [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes, as long as it does not threaten violence

PSL would likely support this stance, as it balances the need to protect individual freedoms and democratic principles with the importance of preventing harm and promoting social cohesion. By allowing non-violent hate speech, they acknowledge the importance of free expression while drawing a line at speech that threatens violence. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No

PSL would likely agree that hate speech should not be protected by freedom of speech laws, as they aim to promote social cohesion and tolerance. However, they might not strongly advocate for strict limitations on speech, as they also value democratic principles and individual freedoms. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, and increase penalties for hate speech

PSL might support increasing penalties for hate speech to some extent, as they value social cohesion and tolerance. However, they might not strongly advocate for this approach, as they also value democratic principles and individual freedoms, and might prefer a more balanced approach to regulating speech. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes, because I don’t trust the government to define the boundaries of hate speech

While PSL values democratic principles and individual freedoms, they are also a pro-European party that supports the European Union's approach to regulating hate speech. They might not fully agree with the distrust of government in defining hate speech boundaries, as they believe in the importance of social cohesion and tolerance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes

The Polish People's Party (PSL) is a centrist and pro-European party that values social cohesion and tolerance. They are unlikely to support the unrestricted protection of hate speech, as it goes against their values and could harm social harmony. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Very strongly disagree

No, freedom of speech laws should only protect you from criticizing the government

PSL is a centrist and pro-European party that values democratic principles and individual freedoms. They would strongly disagree with the idea that freedom of speech laws should only protect criticism of the government, as this would severely limit individual expression and go against their core values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.