ChatGPTNo, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy |
People’s Party [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No, cuts to public spending will negatively affect the economy
PSL would likely agree with this statement, as they believe that cuts to public spending could negatively affect social welfare and rural development, which are key priorities for the party. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
No, focus on ending tax evasion instead
PSL would likely support focusing on ending tax evasion as a way to reduce the national debt, as it aligns with their support for progressive taxation and social welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, increase taxes on the wealthy instead
PSL has historically supported progressive taxation and might be more inclined to increase taxes on the wealthy to reduce the national debt, rather than cutting public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, increase taxes on large multinational corporations instead
PSL might support increasing taxes on large multinational corporations as an alternative to cutting public spending, as they have historically supported progressive taxation.
Agree
No
PSL is not strictly against public spending, as they support social welfare and rural development. However, they might be open to discussing alternative ways to reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, reduce military spending instead
While PSL might not be strictly against reducing military spending, it is not one of their main priorities. They are more focused on social welfare and rural development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, reduce the number of government officials instead
Reducing the number of government officials might not be a main priority for PSL, but they could be open to discussing it as an alternative to cutting public spending. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
PSL might be open to reducing benefits and salaries of government officials, but it is not one of their main priorities. They are more focused on social welfare and rural development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Neutral
Yes, and increase taxes
PSL might be open to increasing taxes, but they are not likely to support cuts to public spending, as it could negatively affect their key priorities, such as social welfare and rural development. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes
The Polish People's Party (PSL) generally supports social welfare and rural development, which would be negatively affected by cuts to public spending. They are more likely to seek alternative ways to reduce the national debt. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Very strongly disagree
Yes, and eliminate federal agencies that are unconstitutional
PSL is not a party that advocates for eliminating federal agencies based on constitutional grounds. This answer does not align with their political stance. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 11hrs ago
People’s Party Voters’ Answer: Yes, but by drastically reducing the benefits and salaries of government officials
Importance: Less Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 124 voters that identify as People’s Party [political party].
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to People’s Party [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.