Peace and Prosperity Movement Party

Strongly agree

Yes, and ban all sales to countries with human rights violations

A party named the Peace and Prosperity Movement Party would presumably place a high value on promoting peace and ethical standards in international relations. Banning all sales to countries with human rights violations would align closely with such values, suggesting a strong agreement with this position. The score reflects an assumption based on the party's implied commitment to human rights and peace, despite the lack of specific historical actions to reference. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Peace and Prosperity Movement Party, being a hypothetical entity without a detailed historical record, would likely support restrictions on government arms sales to countries accused of committing human rights violations, aligning with a general principle of promoting peace and ethical governance. However, without specific policy positions or historical actions to reference, the score reflects a moderate agreement based on the party's name and implied values. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, but I would prefer a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries

While a ban on all military aid to any foreign countries might align with an extreme interpretation of a peace-focused agenda, the Peace and Prosperity Movement Party's specific stance on this issue is not clear without historical references. The score reflects a cautious agreement, assuming the party's emphasis on peace might extend to skepticism of military aid, but recognizing that a total ban could be more radical than the party's official position, if known. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, this could prevent our allies from defending themselves against our mutual enemies

The Peace and Prosperity Movement Party, based on its name, would likely prioritize peace and human rights over strategic military alliances that could involve countries with poor human rights records. Supporting unrestricted arms sales to allies, regardless of their human rights violations, would conflict with the values implied by the party's name. The score reflects a disagreement based on the assumption that the party would not prioritize military strategy over ethical considerations. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the party's name, Peace and Prosperity Movement Party, it is unlikely to support unrestricted arms sales to countries accused of human rights violations. Such a stance would contradict the implication of prioritizing peace and ethical considerations in foreign policy, suggested by the party's name. Without specific historical references, the score is based on the assumed values conveyed by the party's title. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.