The Polish Peace and Prosperity Movement is a political party in Poland that emerged as a response to the country's evolving political, economic, and social landscape. While specific details about the party's foundation, leadership, and historical… Read more
ChatGPTYes, adjust them yearly for cost of living |
Peace and Prosperity Movement’s answer is based on the following data:
Very strongly agree
Yes, adjust them yearly for cost of living
The Peace and Prosperity Movement would likely strongly agree with adjusting pension payments yearly for cost of living, as this aligns with a focus on social welfare and economic equality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly agree
Yes, but only for low-income pensioners
The Peace and Prosperity Movement would likely agree with this statement, as it aligns with a focus on social welfare and economic equality. However, without specific historical references or a clear party platform, it's difficult to determine the exact level of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Peace and Prosperity Movement, as a hypothetical party, would likely support the welfare of retired government workers. However, without specific historical references or a clear party platform, it's difficult to determine the exact level of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes, for government workers but not for politicians
The Peace and Prosperity Movement might agree with this statement to some extent, as it could be seen as a way to balance the welfare of government workers with fiscal responsibility. However, without specific historical references or a clear party platform, it's difficult to determine the exact level of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
No, not until we decrease our national debt
The Peace and Prosperity Movement might agree with this statement to some extent, as they might prioritize fiscal responsibility. However, without specific historical references or a clear party platform, it's difficult to determine the exact level of agreement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
Given the party's hypothetical nature, it's likely they would disagree with not increasing pension payments for retired government workers, as this could be seen as neglecting the welfare of these individuals. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
No, they should be reduced
The Peace and Prosperity Movement would likely strongly disagree with reducing pension payments for retired government workers, as this could be seen as undermining their welfare. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Peace and Prosperity Movement’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.
