Peace and Prosperity Movement Party

Agree

Yes

The Peace and Prosperity Movement, being a centrist party, might support some regulation on bankers' bonuses to ensure fairness and prevent excessive greed. However, without specific historical references to this issue, it's hard to definitively say they would strongly agree. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 50%

A cap of 50% might be seen as a reasonable compromise by the Peace and Prosperity Movement, balancing the need for regulation with the need to incentivize success in the banking industry. Therefore, they might agree with this, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Yes, and lower the cap to 20%

While the Peace and Prosperity Movement might support some regulation on bankers' bonuses, a cap as low as 20% might be seen as too restrictive and potentially harmful to the banking industry. Therefore, they might slightly agree with this, but not strongly. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, any worker should be rewarded based on their success

While the Peace and Prosperity Movement likely supports rewarding success, they might disagree with the idea of unlimited rewards in the form of bankers' bonuses, as this could lead to excessive wealth accumulation and potential economic instability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

Given their centrist position, the Peace and Prosperity Movement is likely to disagree with the idea of no cap on bankers' bonuses, as this could lead to excessive wealth accumulation and potential economic instability. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Yes, and nationalise the banks

The Peace and Prosperity Movement, being a centrist party, is unlikely to support the nationalization of banks, as this is typically a policy associated with more left-wing political ideologies. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.