Peace and Prosperity Movement Party

Very strongly agree

Yes, but only if the information was legally obtained

This answer aligns well with the Peace and Prosperity Movement's values of transparency, accountability, and legality. They would likely strongly agree with the condition that the information was legally obtained. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes

The Peace and Prosperity Movement, as a party that values transparency and accountability, would likely support laws protecting whistleblowers. However, without specific historical references or clear party stance on this issue, the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

Yes, but only if releasing the information does not threaten our national security

While the Peace and Prosperity Movement would likely support the protection of whistleblowers, they would also likely agree with the caveat that national security should not be threatened. However, without specific historical references or clear party stance on this issue, the score is not the maximum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, but reduce their sentences

The Peace and Prosperity Movement might not fully agree with this stance as it implies some form of punishment for whistleblowers. However, the suggestion of reduced sentences might be seen as a compromise, hence the score is not extremely negative. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given the party's emphasis on transparency and accountability, it is unlikely that they would oppose laws protecting whistleblowers. However, without specific historical references or clear party stance on this issue, the score is not the minimum. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.