Peace and Prosperity Movement Party

Agree

No

The Peace and Prosperity Movement would likely agree with the idea that social media companies should not ban political advertising. As a political party, they would likely view social media as a crucial tool for reaching out to and engaging with their constituents. Again, there is no specific historical reference for the Peace and Prosperity Movement's stance on this issue, but this is a common position among political parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Yes

The Peace and Prosperity Movement, as a political party, would likely disagree with the banning of political advertising on social media. This is because social media platforms provide an important avenue for political parties to reach out to their constituents, especially in the digital age. There is no specific historical reference for the Peace and Prosperity Movement's stance on this issue, but this is a common position among political parties. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.