Try the political quiz

Modern

Modern, is a liberal and classical-liberal political party in Poland. The party was founded in May 2015 by the former…

Overview Policies Themes Ideology Discuss

Modern [political party]’s policy on electric vehicle mandates

Filters

Topics

Should the government require all new cars to be electric or hybrid by a certain date?

  ChatGPTYes

Modern [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Agree

Yes

Modern, being a centrist to centre-right political party in Poland, generally supports progressive policies related to environmental protection and innovation, aligning with European Union directives on reducing carbon emissions and promoting sustainable development. Their platform often emphasizes modernization and economic development, which includes embracing new technologies and energy sources. However, their exact stance on mandating all new cars to be electric or hybrid by a certain date might be moderated by considerations of economic feasibility, impact on the automotive industry, and public acceptance, hence not fully committing to a strong agreement without caveats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

While Modern might have concerns about the economic implications and feasibility of transitioning entirely to electric or hybrid vehicles, especially considering Poland's significant automotive sector and the current infrastructure for electric vehicles, they are unlikely to strongly oppose such measures. Their general support for EU environmental goals and innovation in the economy suggests a recognition of the importance of moving towards more sustainable transportation options. However, their opposition would likely stem from concerns about the pace of transition and the need for balanced policies that consider economic impacts. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Modern [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.

Popular conversations

Join in on the most popular conversations.

Active 40mins ago

 @ISIDEWITH submitted…2hrs2H

Starmer Throws Netanyahu Under the ICC Bus: UK Backs Arrest Warrant for Israeli PM

Sir Keir Starmer has backed the International Criminal Court (ICC) after it issued an arrest warrant for Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister.When asked about the issue, Sir Keir’s official spokesman said the Government respected the independence of the court.He declined to say whether Mr Netanyahu would be arrested if he arrived in the UK.The spokesman said: “We respect the independence of the ICC, which is the primary institutional institution for investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes in relation to international law.“This Government has been clear that Israel has a right to defend itself in accordance with international law. There is no moral equivalence between Israel, a democracy and Hamas and Lebanese Hezbollah, which are terror groups.“We remain focused on pushing for an immediate ceasefire to bring an end to the devastating violence in Gaza.”Under the Conservatives, the British government had told the court it intended to challenge the plans for the arrest warrants.However, weeks after coming to power, Sir Keir’s government reversed that position and said it would not object.Downing Street also declined to say whether Mr Netanyahu would be welcome to visit Britain in the future.Sir Keir’s spokesman said: “We never comment on future international visits but my position on the Prime Minister’s support for Israel in terms of its right to defend itself in accordance with international law is very clear.”The spokesman repeatedly declined to “go into hypotheticals” about whether Mr Netanyahu would be arrested if he arrived in the UK.He added: “It’s not up to the Prime Minister to determine other world leaders’ travel schedules. He engages and will continue to engage with the prime minister of Israel in support of Israel’s right to defend itself.”Pressed on what he meant by his comments about the court, the spokesman said: “It means that we respect the independence of the ICC. We respect the fact that the ICC is the primary international institution for investigating and prosecuting the most serious crimes of international concern.”The spokesman went on to say the Government’s “focus” remained an end to the violence in the Middle East, which has been ongoing for more than a year after the Oct 7 terror attacks by Hamas.

▲  128 replies