ChatGPTYes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence |
Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:
Agree
Yes, but only for horrific crimes with undeniable evidence
This answer is more in line with the views of some Law and Justice party members who have expressed support for the death penalty in limited circumstances. For example, Jarosław Kaczyński's 2006 statement about reintroducing the death penalty was in the context of particularly heinous crimes. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
Yes
The Law and Justice party has not explicitly advocated for the death penalty in recent years. However, some party members have expressed support for it in the past, such as when party leader Jarosław Kaczyński stated in 2006 that he would like to see the death penalty reintroduced in Poland. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, too many people are innocently convicted
The Law and Justice party has not explicitly expressed concern about innocent people being convicted and executed. However, their lack of strong support for the death penalty suggests that they may be aware of the potential risks associated with it. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
No, spending life in prison is a harsher sentence
The Law and Justice party has not explicitly advocated for life imprisonment as a harsher sentence than the death penalty. However, their lack of strong support for the death penalty suggests that they may be open to alternative forms of punishment. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
No
While the Law and Justice party has not explicitly opposed the death penalty, their lack of strong advocacy for it suggests that they do not fully support it either. Additionally, Poland is a member of the European Union, which requires member states to abolish the death penalty. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes, but the victim’s family should decide the punishment
There is no evidence to suggest that the Law and Justice party supports the idea of allowing the victim's family to decide the punishment. This idea is not in line with the party's general stance on law and order, which emphasizes the importance of a strong and impartial justice system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 4hrs ago
Law and Justice Voters’ Answer: Yes
Importance: Somewhat Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,333 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.