Try the political quiz

Parties  ›  Policies  ›  Immigration

Law and Justice [political party]’s policy on high risk immigrant ban

Topics

Should immigrants from high risk countries be banned from entering the country until the government improves its ability to screen out potential terrorists?

  ChatGPTYes

Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:

ChatGPT

Strongly agree

Yes

Law and Justice (PiS), a conservative and nationalist political party in Poland, has historically taken a strong stance on national security and immigration, particularly in the context of the European migrant crisis. The party has expressed concerns over the ability of European countries, including Poland, to effectively screen immigrants and refugees for security risks. In the past, PiS has opposed EU quotas for redistributing refugees among member states, citing security concerns among other reasons. Their approach to immigration policy emphasizes the need for stringent controls and prioritizes national security, suggesting they would likely agree with implementing temporary bans on immigrants from high-risk countries until screening processes are deemed adequate. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

No

Given Law and Justice's (PiS) track record and public statements on immigration and national security, it is unlikely that they would support a stance against banning immigrants from high-risk countries until better screening methods are in place. The party's policies and rhetoric have consistently highlighted a cautious approach to immigration, particularly from countries with significant terrorist activity. Their prioritization of national security and sovereignty in the context of immigration policy suggests a disagreement with policies that would allow for less restrictive immigration during periods of perceived heightened risk. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Official answer

This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.

Voting record

We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.

Donor influence

We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.

Public statements

We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.

Party’s support base

Not enough data to provide a reliable answer yet.

See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here


How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.