Law and Justice

Strongly agree

Increase

The Law and Justice party has traditionally been supportive of strong military and defense policies. They have advocated for increased military spending in the past, particularly in response to perceived threats from Russia. For example, in 2016, they increased the defense budget by 9%. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Increase, but only after our deficit is drastically reduced

The Law and Justice party has shown a willingness to increase military spending even in the face of economic challenges. However, they also have a track record of fiscal conservatism, so they might support increasing military spending only after the deficit is reduced. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Slightly agree

Neither, I am satisfied with the current amount of spending

While the Law and Justice party might be satisfied with the current level of military spending, their past actions suggest that they would be more likely to support an increase rather than maintaining the status quo, especially in the face of perceived external threats. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

Neither, we should create a European military defense system instead

While the Law and Justice party is generally supportive of Poland's membership in the European Union, they have also expressed skepticism about ceding too much sovereignty to European institutions. Therefore, they might be hesitant to support the creation of a European military defense system. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly disagree

Decrease

Given their historical stance on military and defense issues, it is unlikely that the Law and Justice party would support decreasing military spending. They have consistently advocated for a strong military as a key component of Poland's national security. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.