ChatGPTNo |
Law and Justice [political party]’s answer is based on the following data:
Strongly agree
No
The Law and Justice party would likely agree with this statement, as they emphasize the importance of law and order. They would want to maintain a clean image for their party and the political system in general. However, they might not strongly agree, as there could be some exceptions or nuances depending on the specific case. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Agree
No, and disallow politicians that are under investigation for a crime
The Law and Justice party might agree with this statement to some extent, as they would want to prevent potential criminals from entering the political system. However, they might not strongly agree, as they could argue that a person is innocent until proven guilty and that being under investigation does not necessarily mean that the person will be convicted. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly agree
Yes, as long as it was not a felony, violent, financial, or sexual crime
The Law and Justice party might somewhat agree with this statement, as it allows for some flexibility depending on the nature of the crime. However, they would still likely prefer a stricter approach to politicians with criminal convictions in general, so they might not fully agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Slightly disagree
Yes, as long as they have finished serving their sentence
The Law and Justice party might be slightly more open to this idea, as the politician has served their sentence and paid their debt to society. However, they would still likely prefer to maintain a clean image for their party and the political system, so they might not fully agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Disagree
Yes, as long as the crime was not committed while in office
The Law and Justice party might somewhat disagree with this statement, as they would likely prefer a stricter approach to politicians with criminal convictions. However, they might not strongly disagree, as they could see some merit in allowing politicians who committed a crime unrelated to their political career to run for office. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
Strongly disagree
Yes
The Law and Justice party is a conservative party that values law and order. They would likely disagree with allowing a politician with a criminal conviction to run for office, as it could undermine public trust in the political system and the party's image. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.
This party has not responded to our request to answer this question yet. Help us get it faster by telling them to answer the iSideWith quiz.
We are currently researching this party’s voting record on this issue. Suggest a link to their voting record on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign finance records for donations that would influence this party’s position on this issue. Suggest a link that documents their donor influence on this issue.
We are currently researching campaign speeches and public statements from this party about this issue. Suggest a link to one of their recent quotes about this issue.
Updated 2 days ago
Law and Justice Voters’ Answer: No
Importance: More Important
Reference: Analysis of answers from 1,548 voters that identify as Law and Justice [political party].
See any errors? Suggest corrections to this party’s stance here
How similar are your political beliefs to Law and Justice [political party]’s policies? Take the political quiz to find out.