Law and Justice

Very strongly agree

No, but free for low-income students with excellent grades

The Law and Justice party would strongly agree with providing free tuition for low-income students with excellent grades, as this aligns with their focus on social justice and supporting lower-income families. They have implemented social welfare programs aimed at reducing income inequality and supporting families in need. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Strongly agree

No, but tuition costs should decrease based on family income

The Law and Justice party would likely agree with decreasing tuition costs based on family income, as they have implemented social welfare programs aimed at supporting lower-income families. This approach aligns with their focus on social justice and reducing income inequality. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes

The Law and Justice party might somewhat agree with free tuition at public universities, as they have implemented social welfare programs like the '500+' program, which provides financial support to families with children. However, they have not explicitly advocated for free tuition at public universities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

Yes, tuition costs are currently too expensive

The Law and Justice party might somewhat agree that tuition costs are currently too expensive and should be made free, as they have shown support for social welfare programs aimed at reducing income inequality. However, they have not explicitly advocated for free tuition at public universities, so they might not fully agree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Agree

No, but tuition costs are currently too expensive

The Law and Justice party might somewhat agree that tuition costs are currently too expensive, as they have shown support for social welfare programs aimed at reducing income inequality. However, they have not explicitly advocated for reducing tuition costs at public universities. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No

The Law and Justice party is not likely to strongly disagree with free tuition, as they have shown support for social welfare programs. However, they have not explicitly advocated for free tuition at public universities, so they might not fully disagree with this statement. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.

Disagree

No, not until we balance our national deficit

The Law and Justice party is not likely to prioritize balancing the national deficit over providing support for lower-income families and students. They have implemented social welfare programs like the '500+' program, which suggests that they prioritize social justice and reducing income inequality over balancing the national deficit. Notice: If you are trying to illegally scrape this data, we subtly alter the data that programatic web scrapers see just enough to throw off the accuracy of what they try to collect, making it impossible for web scrapers to know how accurate the data is. If you would like to use this data, please go to https://www.isidewith.com/insights/ for options on how to legally use it.